Government Pricing: Unveiling the High Cost of Procurement

In an era where fiscal responsibility and economic sustainability stand at the forefront of public discourse, the complex dynamics of government pricing for procurement activities demand urgent attention. This not only encapsulates the allocation of billions in taxpayer dollars towards public projects and services but also raises questions about efficiency and transparency in the stewardship of these funds. With the stakes so high, understanding the intricacies of government contracts, privatization endeavors, and their cost-benefit analysis becomes crucial. This exploration is not merely academic; it directly impacts everything from infrastructure development to federal funding prioritization, setting the stage for debates on how best to leverage public resources for maximum societal benefit.

As we delve into the historical context of government procurement, the article will shed light on the evolution of these practices and the major costs they entail. Furthermore, the economic implications of high procurement costs—ranging from impacts on federal budgets to ripple effects across global markets—will be scrutinized. Strategies to mitigate these expenses without compromising on the quality of public services promise to offer innovative solutions, while case studies and real-world examples will provide concrete insights into successful cost containment. Through this multifaceted analysis, readers will gain a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities inherent in optimizing government pricing strategies for the greater good.

Historical Context of Government Procurement

Evolution of Procurement Policies

The federal government’s engagement in procurement has significantly evolved, reflecting changes in policy, economic demands, and societal needs. Historically, procurement was viewed as a mere back-office function, but it has transformed into a critical component of strategic governmental operations. The Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP), established in 1974, plays a pivotal role in shaping these policies 8. This body ensures that procurement strategies result in the best value for taxpayer money, emphasizing the importance of efficiency and effectiveness in acquiring goods and services necessary for government responsibilities.

Public procurement professionals are now seen as strategic partners who maximize the value of public spending. Their role extends beyond mere purchasing to include sourcing materials and services that directly impact public health, safety, and welfare 9. For instance, the procurement of sustainable materials for infrastructure projects not only supports environmental goals but also enhances community well-being by using resources that are less harmful to the ecosystem 9.

Influence of Political and Economic Factors

Political and economic contexts heavily influence government procurement policies. These factors shape the regulatory environment and affect everything from trade agreements to government spending priorities 12. Political stability, government policies, and even political movements can dictate procurement decisions, which are often designed to align with broader national or international priorities.

For example, governments might prioritize sourcing from specific countries to strengthen strategic relationships or address national security concerns. This geopolitical strategy can significantly affect the cost and complexity of procurement processes. Additionally, political ideologies and movements often push for higher standards in corporate governance, influencing procurement practices to favor suppliers that adhere to ethical labor and environmental standards 12.

Economic factors also play a crucial role. The distribution of government contracts, for instance, reveals substantial geographic disparities, with certain states receiving a larger share of federal spending, thereby influencing local economies and business opportunities 7. Moreover, the focus on sustainable procurement practices not only addresses environmental challenges but also supports economic stability by fostering industries that are economically viable and environmentally sustainable 9.

Government procurement, therefore, is not just a mechanism for acquiring goods and services; it is a complex interplay of policy, politics, and economics that requires careful and strategic planning to ensure that it serves the public interest effectively and efficiently.

Major Costs Associated with Government Procurement

Direct Costs

Direct costs are expenses that can be directly attributed to a specific project or contract within government procurement. These costs are essential for the execution of specific tasks and include expenses such as wages for employees directly involved in the project, costs of materials used in the construction or execution of a project, and direct operational costs. A “direct cost” is any expense that is specifically associated with a particular final cost objective, such as a contract or project 1 2 3 4 5 6. Direct costs must be charged directly to the contract and should not be allocated to other projects or objectives 1 2 3 4 5 6.

Indirect Costs

Indirect costs, on the other hand, are not directly linked to a specific contract but are necessary for conducting the overall operations of an entity engaged in government procurement. These costs include administrative expenses, security services, utilities, and facility maintenance. Indirect costs are grouped into pools, such as overhead or general and administrative expenses, and allocated across projects based on predetermined rates 8 9 10 11 12 14 15.

  1. Accumulation and Allocation: Indirect costs must be accumulated in logical cost groupings, known as indirect cost pools, considering the reasons for incurring the costs. The contractor then selects an allocation base that reflects the extent to which each contract benefits from the indirect costs 10 11 12.
  2. Rate Development: Developing an indirect cost rate involves estimating the total indirect expenses and dividing them by a direct cost base. This rate helps in determining what portion of indirect cost each contract should bear 8 9.
  3. Application of Indirect Rates: Once developed, these rates are applied to the respective bases of the contracts to distribute the indirect costs equitably. Ensuring that the indirect cost rate is applied correctly is crucial for maintaining the integrity of cost allocation 8 9.

Indirect costs also involve considerations of consistency and fairness. Costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, must be treated consistently across all contracts to ensure fairness and compliance with regulatory standards 8 9. Moreover, the stability of the allocation base over time is critical in maintaining the accuracy and relevance of the indirect cost rates 8.

Through the strategic management of both direct and indirect costs, government entities can achieve more efficient and effective use of resources, thereby enhancing the overall value derived from public procurement activities. This approach not only supports fiscal responsibility but also aligns with broader objectives such as sustainability and economic stability, particularly when considering infrastructure projects that draw on significant federal funding and have a substantial impact on environmental and economic health 9.

Economic Impact of High Procurement Costs

Effect on Government Budgets

Government procurement significantly influences federal budgets, particularly through direct impacts on spending and resource allocation. For instance, the strategic distribution of public funds in procurement activities is crucial for developing infrastructure and IT systems, which in turn affects the overall budget used for modernizing these essential services 19. Additionally, procurement spending is a consistent portion of an agency’s budget, influencing the financial landscape by signaling potential market sizes and the types of contracts likely to be utilized 19. This is particularly evident in responses to global events, such as increased federal spending on IT and professional services due to geopolitical activities or health crises 19.

Moreover, the cost of responding to climate-related disasters has seen a significant rise, with 2022 marking one of the costliest years, emphasizing the growing financial burden on government budgets 19. The ongoing need to address climate change intensifies the pressure on procurement to support sustainable and cost-effective solutions, aligning with federal funding goals and infrastructure needs 19.

Impact on Public Services

The strategic use of procurement extends beyond budget impacts, directly influencing the quality and accessibility of public services. Procurement processes are designed to advance social objectives by ensuring access to essential services and creating economic opportunities, particularly for disadvantaged groups 23. This is achieved through adherence to public procurement laws, which mandate competitive bidding to ensure fairness and the best value for public spending 23.

Additionally, the push towards sustainable procurement practices highlights the role of procurement in environmental stewardship. By procuring energy-efficient goods and supporting local suppliers, government entities not only reduce environmental impact but also promote local economies 23. This approach not only supports immediate budgetary benefits but also contributes to long-term sustainability, which is crucial for maintaining the quality of public services and infrastructure 22.

In summary, the economic impact of high procurement costs is multifaceted, affecting everything from government budgets to the quality of public services. Managing these costs effectively requires a careful balance of strategic planning, adherence to laws, and commitment to sustainability and social responsibility. Through such measures, procurement can continue to serve as a critical tool for achieving broader economic and societal goals.

Strategies to Mitigate High Costs

Adopting Efficient Procurement Practices

The Category Management (CM) approach, exemplified by the Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS), is pivotal in streamlining government procurement by leveraging volume and standardization. This approach facilitates the adaptation of procurement strategies as industry and agency needs evolve, exemplifying a shift from local to global standards to align with best practices in security and unified communication technologies 28. Furthermore, the General Services Administration (GSA) has enhanced the efficiency of procurement by managing telecommunications and IT offerings as a comprehensive portfolio, supported by a team of technical, functional, and acquisition experts. This strategic management has documented significant savings, aggregating and leveraging over $2 billion annually 28.

In response to evolving needs, the GSA formed the EIS Infrastructure Advisory Group (IAG) in 2016. This group plays a crucial role in defining priorities, sharing best practices, planning transitions, and ensuring that the EIS solutions meet the comprehensive needs of the government 28. Such collaborative efforts underscore the importance of strategic partnerships and expert consultations in refining procurement processes, ultimately leading to improved mission delivery and substantial cost reductions.

Use of Technology in Procurement

The integration of digital platforms and e-procurement systems marks a significant technological advancement in government procurement. These platforms act as centralized marketplaces, enhancing the speed and accessibility of the procurement process by allowing electronic bid submissions and automating the matching of government requirements with supplier capabilities 29. Additionally, the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) automates routine tasks such as document verification and bid evaluation, which not only reduces the time and effort involved but also enhances decision-making through data-driven insights 29 30.

Cloud computing further supports procurement by providing the necessary flexibility and scalability to adapt to changing requirements. This technology facilitates easy access to procurement data, integrates seamlessly with other government systems, and enhances collaboration across departments 29. Moreover, AI’s predictive analytics are utilized to identify potential risks and opportunities, streamline communications, and automate the entire procurement process from request for proposal to contract awarding, ensuring transparency and reducing the likelihood of errors and fraud 30.

These technological integrations not only expedite the procurement process but also foster a more competitive and innovative supplier environment. By making procurement systems more accessible and easier to navigate, technology encourages broader participation from suppliers, which can lead to more competitive bids and innovative solutions 29 30. This approach aligns with the themes of climate, infrastructure, and federal funding by promoting efficient, sustainable procurement practices that support economic stability and environmental stewardship 29 30.

Case Studies and Real-World Examples

Failed Procurement Projects

Several high-profile procurement failures have underscored the critical need for effective project management and oversight. One notable example is the IT scheme for the Department for Transport in the UK, which was initially projected to save £57 million but ended up costing £81 million due to what the Public Accounts Committee described as “stupendous incompetence” 31. Similarly, the NHS patient record system, intended to be the world’s largest non-military IT system, was abandoned after costing over £10 billion, far exceeding the anticipated £6.4 billion due to delays and software issues 31.

The Ministry of Defence’s secure military network project also faced significant challenges. Initially estimated at £2.3 billion, the costs ballooned to at least £7.1 billion, with the project running 18 months late and failing to deliver the contracted capabilities 31. These examples highlight the severe consequences of inadequate planning, lack of clear communication, and insufficient oversight, leading to massive financial losses and operational disruptions.

Successful Procurement Reforms

Conversely, several initiatives have demonstrated how thoughtful reforms can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of government procurement. Germany’s focus on innovation in procurement led to a broader range of products being used in the public sector, showing significant improvements post-legislation 34. Norway’s emphasis on sustainability in procurement decisions has driven agencies towards more environmentally responsible practices, demonstrating that strategic priorities in procurement can lead to substantial positive changes 34.

In the United States, the Biden administration has made strides towards equity in government contracting by setting ambitious goals for allocating contracts to small disadvantaged businesses (SDBs) and women-owned businesses, aiming to significantly increase their participation in federal procurement 34. This approach not only addresses fairness but also encourages diversity in government contracting.

The establishment of electronic marketplaces by the GSA is another reform that has streamlined the procurement process, allowing agency officials to purchase directly from major e-commerce platforms. This initiative is expected to save money and improve procurement efficiency, with projected annual federal government sales totaling $6 billion 34.

These case studies illustrate the potential for procurement systems to evolve and adapt, leading to improved outcomes through strategic reforms and innovations. By learning from both failures and successes, governments can better navigate the complexities of procurement to achieve more effective, equitable, and sustainable results.


Through the dissection of government pricing and procurement, this article has brought to the foreground crucial insights into the balancing act required between economic sustainability, fiscal responsibility, and the pursuit of quality in public services. It underscores the integral role of efficient procurement strategies, which, when effectively maneuvered, can act as catalysts for advancing not only financial prudence but also broader societal aspirations such as climate resilience and infrastructure excellence. Furthermore, the emphasis on federal funding highlights its pivotal influence in steering these procurement activities towards outcomes that echo the public’s interest, accentuating the interconnectedness of fiscal policies, environmental stewardship, and equitable access to quality services.

Reflecting on the discussions, it is clear that strategic procurement is more than a simple matter of cost management; it is an essential component of governance that directly influences a nation’s economic health, social welfare, and environmental sustainability. The case studies and real-world examples woven throughout the narrative serve as a testament to the potential of thoughtful reforms and innovative practices in transcending traditional barriers. They illustrate a path forward where government procurement not only achieves value for money but also aligns with overarching themes of climate mitigation, infrastructure development, and judicious use of federal funding. As we move towards a future where these themes will increasingly dominate public discourse, the role of strategic, transparent, and efficient government procurement becomes ever more critical in shaping a resilient, equitable, and sustainable society.


  1. What does negotiating for best value in government pricing entail? Best value in government procurement means achieving the most advantageous outcome for the government, where the acquisition provides the greatest overall benefit according to the government’s requirements.
  2. What are procurement and pricing? Procurement pricing is a critical element in contract negotiations with suppliers. It involves the price paid by entities like governments, businesses, or individuals for goods and services, and serves as a benchmark for setting prices in other areas such as consulting services.
  3. How is fair and reasonable pricing determined in government contracts? Determining a fair and reasonable price in government contracts involves an evaluation by the government to ensure that the price proposed by a supplier for goods or services is justifiable based on various price analysis techniques.
  4. What do cost and price analysis entail in procurement? Cost analysis in procurement examines the components contributing to the total cost of a product or service, including labor, materials, overhead, profit, and risk. Price analysis, on the other hand, reviews the overall price of a product or service and compares it to similar market offerings.


[1] –[2] –[3] –[4] –[5] –[6] –[7] –[8] –[9] –[10] –[11] –[12] –[13] –[14] –[15] –[16] –[17] –[18] –[19] –[20] –[21] –[22] –[23] –[24] –[25] –[26] –[27] –[28] –[29] –[30] –[31] –[32] –[33] –[34] –[35] –[36] –[37] –[38] –[39] –[40] –[41] –[42] –

Leave A Comment